Modular representation theory of finite groups
Material type:
TextLanguage: English Publication details: Dordrecht : Springer, 2013.Description: viii, 178 p. : ill. ; 24 cmISBN: - 9781447148319
- B271 Q3 NBHM
Textual
| Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Textual
|
Faculty of Mathematical Sciences Library | Central Science Library | B271 Q3 NBHM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | SL1656221 |
Browsing Central Science Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| B271 P4 NBHM Representation theory of finite reductive groups | B271 P6 NBHM Modular representations of finite groups of Lie type | B271 Q1 TB Linear Algebraic Groups and Finite Groups of Lie Type | B271 Q3 NBHM Modular representation theory of finite groups | B27M09 M2 NBHM Representation theory : selected papers | B27m09 M9 NBHM Lie groups and Lie algebras | B27m09 P8 NBHM Lie groups and Lie algebras chapters 4- 6 |
Includes bibliographical references (p. 175) and index.
1. Prerequisites in module theory -- 2. The Cartan-Brauer Triangle -- 3. The Brauer character -- 4. Green's theory of indecomposable modules -- 5. Blocks.
Modular Representation Theory of finite Groups comprises this second situation. Many additional tools are needed for this case. To mention some, there is the systematic use of Grothendieck groups leading to the Cartan matrix and the decomposition matrix of the group as well as Green's direct analysis of indecomposable representations. There is also the strategy of writing the category of all representations as the direct product of certain subcategories, the so-called 'blocks' of the group. Brauer's work then establishes correspondences between the blocksof the original group and blocks of certain subgroups the philosophy being that one is thereby reduced to a simpler situation. In particular, one can measure how nonsemisimple a category a block is by the size and structure of its so-called 'defect group'. All these concepts are made explicit for the example of the special linear group of two-by-two matrices over a finite prime field.
Although the presentation is strongly biased towards the module theoretic point of view an attempt is made to strike a certain balance by also showing the reader the group theoretic approach. In particular, in the case of defect groups a detailed proof of the equivalence of the two approaches is given.
There are no comments on this title.
